If an objection of bias is then made, it will be the duty of the Chairman to consider the objection and exercise his judgment upon it. The test to be applied as stated by Lord Hope in Porter v Magill 6 20021 2 AC 357, at para 103 and recited by Pill LJ in Lodwick v London Borough of Southwark at para 18 in determining bias is: whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the Tribunal was biased. Burton J sets out that summary in paragraph 13 of his judgment as he puts it, slightly reordering the propositions, and they run from 1 to 11: "l. He obviously himself accepts that summary. Indeed his summary of the law and the points that arise from the various cases in this area has been accepted by Mr Ansar as an accurate summary, being a summary it should be said prepared by Mr Gidney. He also considered the decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, which could have been said to support Mr Ansar's argument, and he summarised the law with some care in his judgment. Burton J on that issue considered the authorities relating to bias. Having indicated to Mr Ansar that the Regional Chairman had ruled on the matter, Mr Ansar did not pursue his claim for me to stand down, but asked that I should record that my continuing to hear the Pre-Hearing Review was not with his consent." Go to The Regional Chairman, accordingly, declined Mr Ansar's request that I recuse myself. Mr Ansar had made his complaint to the Regional Chairman, who determined that as I heard the first case it was appropriate for me to hear this case. The hearing was prefaced by repeated application by Mr Ansar that I'should recuse myself from hearing the applications on the grounds that Mr Ansar had appealed an earlier Judgment of which I was the Chairman, and had made criticisms of the manner in which I had conducted the case, in particular, that I had displayed bias against him. When he ultimately gave his reasons for the decisions that he took at that hearing, Mr Kolanko included paragraphs relating to the application to recuse himself in these terms: "2. When the Directions Hearing came on, Mr Ansar applied to Mr Kolanko himself to recuse himself and Mr Kolanko refused to do so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |